Google

We Are DEAF! GTF Over It.

Written on:June 15, 2011
Comments are closed

I was ready to jump down MM’s throat when he write his article, We’re disabled just get over it… but the angel sitting on my right shoulder, whispered some words of humility in my ear and urged me to show some compassion.

“Shit!” said Mephisto, as the Angel smiled beatifically.

Well MM’s article is a mess. It leaves you confused because he stakes out a position, usually anti- Deaf, and then goes on to prove his assertion by arguing against it, thinking he is arguing for it, and making all these illuminating observations, which have no bearing on the argument he is trying to make.

Confused? I am? Besides it’s late, as I write this.

Still, if his argument is in the headline, We’re disabled just get over it… then he pretty much should have stopped there. It would be more prudent for MM to publish headlines, one liners that sum up his position succinctly without destroying his credibility.

Still, it’s a free world [so we are lead to believe] and it is his right to express himself in any manner he chooses.

If you examine his argument [s], you will find that he does a pretty good job of damning the hearing world [if that is his intention, which I don’t think it is], for which he so desperately wants to be part of. Thinking he is admonishing us, for getting our knickers in a knot over the word disability, he is actually damning the Hearing world for its inability to see deafness as anything but a disability.

MM can see Deafness as a culture, he just doesn’t accept it. He doesn’t accept it as a valid way of being, living and defining oneself. He perceives that the problem of our disconnect from the hearing world, is all of our own making. He blames the problems deaf people suffer on Deaf people who are trying to carve out abetter world. He filters his perceptions through the prism of a desperation to belong to a world he has been excluded from, by virtue of his own disability, his deafness.

Sure, the Hearing world has a lot to answer for. They are perpetually stuck in a stereotypical thinking of deafness. They are so stuck, that the only solutions they can conceive of is audiological. Meaning, hearing aids, cochlear implants, regrowing hearing cells, eugenics [who said Hitler was dead] without any real thought to the development of Deaf people and how they are defining themselves.

Their quest is aided by a group of people who project this notion of community that is inclusive of all types of deafness. There is no such community. There is only the Deaf community and deaf people [community if you want to stretch it]

Still, We’re disabled just get over it… and Disability – It’s Time for a New Word demonstrate quite succinctly, the tensions we suffer in trying to be who we are, in the midst of a hearing push to define who we are.

We don’t need a new word, we have a perfectly good one that has been reclaimed and redefined. That word is Deaf [pun intended]. With a  capital D! If MM doesn’t like it, stiff shit. If the hearing world can’t handle it, stiff shit.

However, Joanne Anauo does make a valid point in Disability – It’s Time for a New Word regarding the energy we expend in fighting the use of words such as disabled, and perhaps it would be better to harness it towards getting our access needs met.

Then again, words do convey an idea, an image, a concept, and they have a power, a power with which to oppress us or liberate us.

The problem is, if we work within the system and accept its constraints, in order to access the fucking resources owed to us, it depletes our energy and enthusiasm. Energy and enthusiasm that is important for our social well being and mental health.

Then again, having re-read MM’s article We’re disabled just get over it…, perhaps he is making perfect sense? Or is he being ironical?

As for the angel sitting on my right shoulder, he did a little wee. So I will be having words with the man upstairs tonight.

DAD!

8 Comments add one

  1. Cate says:

    Sort of related, sort of not… I wonder if a type of “access insurance” scheme could ever work… If people could pay into a fund, that money be invested to grow, and then in areas where free access can’t be gained by using existing laws, could instead be provided by the insurance fund…? I know it takes the burden off orgs to provide, but… Maybe it could be a secret fund :) known about only by those eligible
    to pay in :)

  2. Legsmaniac says:

    Hmmmm. I took the silly old biddy’s article to be a continuation of his attacks on the RNID regarding their new name and logo with the strikethru “loss”.
    Maybe I’ll have to go read it again but to be honest, anything he writes puts me to sleep or I take with a pinch of salt anyway. The best I ever read was his suspension from BBC Ouch, finally, just days before it’s closure sadly came a little too late but better late than never.

  3. Alan says:

    Jeez some people he doesn’t let up does he, I wish he would get a life, he is a sad…

    • Sirgarg says:

      Streuth!… You do get about Alan but you need to decide where your affiliations rest .
      Metamorphosis for the grub is a difficult one and trying here is just stupidity.

  4. true old American says:

    Yeah, I read his blog and I knew he must be trap in basement of British pub so long time.

  5. Alan.S says:

    Forging posts again Muse ? that isn’t what I posted. As MM said it’s the only way you get response is to post yourself.

  6. Mephisto says:

    Alan, I only approve what I get.. I don’t edit people’s comments. i approved what I got…..

  7. Alan.S says:

    I think you should clarify that while the BBC doesn’t give out information on contributors, there has been no validity at all MM was suspended. As you posted on the ouch site Mr Legs, it is rumor, no doubt YOU started it ? You are wasting your time the man will not rise to you, nor respond. Even my attempt to get him to respond to you was erased.